View Single Post
Old 02-04-2005, 14:29   #49
downquark1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Age: 38
Services: Plusnet FFTC
Posts: 4,939
downquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appeal
downquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appeal
Re: Poplar Proxies don't reach 3 meg speed

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr-b
Have any specific examples of consistently slow web server downloads through a certain proxy (or set of proxies) vs a faster download from the exact same server going via another proxy (or network) actually been reported to ntl? I certainly haven't seen any here.

I would think this is prolly the reason why it hasnt had any 'attention' - I would think that support would find it impossible to analyse a problem when it's just reported as "the proxies are slow/broken" and ppl do seem to have a tendency to blame them for everything under the sun ...

Rather like "When all you have is a hammer [selecting your proxy] - every problem looks like a nail [the proxy]."
Look here:
Quote:
Just posting more evidence:

I have 3 downloads coming from the same fileplanet server, the one going through my regular manchester proxy immediately went to 20KB. I then switched to the col-1 and started 2 more, those are coming through at 88KB and 112KB.
Ok instead of "my regular proxy" I mean the one it was automatically routed through.

We have said many times that downloading the same URL through colchester-1 is faster than the auto-routed method.
__________________

See screenshots
__________________
"Knowledge is Power. Power Corrupts. Study Hard. Be Evil."
downquark1 is offline   Reply With Quote