Thread: Massive Financial Scandals
View Single Post
Old 23-03-2005, 18:38   #7
SMHarman
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Services: Cablevision
Posts: 8,305
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
Re: Massive Financial Scandals
It would though at the moment you are tried by a jury of your peers, this would change the concept to be a jury of your peers with the aptitude to understand the case - especially important since anyone of any seniority in a company will try to wriggle out of jury duty as it will impact their company / key man risk. These of course are the people who could understand the case. The cleaner on the other hand (no offence intended to under employed quantity surveyor cleaners) would struggle at the volume of documents, deposition, expert evidence causing the case to collapse.
SMHarman is offline   Reply With Quote