View Single Post
Old 19-03-2005, 01:10   #3
carlingman
Inactive
 
carlingman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South
Posts: 1,520
carlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appeal
carlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appealcarlingman has a bronzed appeal
Re: Packet loss - please help.

Quote:
Originally Posted by timewarrior2001
I dont **** about with fancy progs, but all I could come up with was:-

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\>ping /t 66.246.72.94

Pinging 66.246.72.94 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=127ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=128ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=154ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=143ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=148ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=118ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=114ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=95ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.246.72.94: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=55


Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\>tracert 66.246.72.94

Tracing route to thor.idns5.com [66.246.72.94]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms Soho Router [192.168.1.1]
2 8 ms 12 ms 9 ms 10.141.63.254
3 11 ms 9 ms 10 ms midd-t2cam1-a-v107.inet.ntl.com [213.106.238.41]

4 11 ms 16 ms 11 ms midd-t2core-a-ge-wan64.inet.ntl.com [213.106.237
.45]
5 12 ms 14 ms 15 ms lee-bb-a-so-130-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.187.89]
6 17 ms 17 ms 25 ms pop-bb-b-so-100-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.238]

7 18 ms 17 ms 26 ms pop-bb-a-ae0-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.172.78]
8 38 ms 19 ms 22 ms tele-ic-2-so-010-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.86]

9 19 ms 21 ms 20 ms ntl-gw.telecomplete.net [213.160.97.41]
10 20 ms 17 ms 18 ms v100-r2.thn.telecomplete.net [213.160.96.54]
11 20 ms 19 ms 17 ms 267.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.ltn.nac.net [213.160.97.146]
12 135 ms 86 ms 86 ms 0.so-0-3-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.233]
13 89 ms 85 ms 87 ms thor.idns5.com [66.246.72.94]

Trace complete.

C:\>tracert 66.246.72.94
Me dont **** around with any fancy ping plotters but a simple tracert as I have posted below shows the problem to increase on the oct.nac.net not with NTL or Pipex in my case on a 512k connection.

C:\>tracert 66.246.72.94

Tracing route to thor.idns5.com [66.246.72.94]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 24 ms 23 ms 25 ms 81-86-***-*.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.***.*]
2 24 ms 25 ms 23 ms eth3-1.cr1.uk5.systems.pipex.net [62.241.161.41]

3 28 ms 23 ms 24 ms ge-1-2-0.cr1.gs1.systems.pipex.net [62.241.161.9
7]
4 26 ms 25 ms 25 ms xpe1.thn.telecomplete.net [217.79.160.58]
5 25 ms 25 ms 28 ms v100-r2.thn.telecomplete.net [213.160.96.54]
6 24 ms 25 ms 25 ms 267.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.ltn.nac.net [213.160.97.146]
7 93 ms 96 ms 94 ms 0.so-0-3-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.233]
8 95 ms 95 ms 109 ms thor.idns5.com [66.246.72.94]

Trace complete.

C:\>tracert 66.246.72.94

Tracing route to thor.idns5.com [66.246.72.94]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 23 ms 23 ms 24 ms 81-86-***-*.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.***.*]
2 23 ms 24 ms 25 ms eth3-1.cr1.uk5.systems.pipex.net [62.241.161.41]

3 25 ms 27 ms 24 ms ge-1-2-0.cr1.gs1.systems.pipex.net [62.241.161.9
7]
4 24 ms 26 ms 26 ms xpe1.thn.telecomplete.net [217.79.160.58]
5 31 ms 24 ms 24 ms v100-r2.thn.telecomplete.net [213.160.96.54]
6 26 ms 27 ms 30 ms 267.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.ltn.nac.net [213.160.97.146]
7 99 ms 164 ms 144 ms 0.so-0-3-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.233]
8 97 ms 97 ms 95 ms thor.idns5.com [66.246.72.94]

Trace complete.

carlingman is offline   Reply With Quote