View Single Post
Old 18-03-2005, 10:46   #11
zovat
Inactive
 
zovat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bracknell
Age: 56
Services: NTL Telephone 3M Broadband - CM Sky TV
Posts: 1,246
zovat has reached the bronze age
zovat has reached the bronze agezovat has reached the bronze agezovat has reached the bronze agezovat has reached the bronze agezovat has reached the bronze agezovat has reached the bronze agezovat has reached the bronze agezovat has reached the bronze age
Send a message via MSN to zovat
Re: Unixtime turning 1111111111!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gareth
Yeah, that's true but I like seeing people's faces when they realise that we'll be going through another Y2K scare
The best bit is that windows is going to be the most affected OS (again)...

Most verisions of Unix already Support 64 bit architectures - Solaris, HP(s)UX, TRU64, AIX etc.
Most versions of linux already have the facility as well....

The biggest problem is the chips - no good trying to run a 64 bit OS on a 32 bit chip....

AMD - have a good, working 64bit chip.
SUN - have a good, working 64 bit chip.
INTEL - have Itanium

so windows on Intel is likely to be the worst affected....

That said, the chances of any of us still maintaining mission critical systems on 32 bit architecture in 33 years is pretty slim.
Most likely we will be running 1024+ bit architectures, and this issue will not even be mentioned. (and personally I expect to be retired and to not give a damn )
zovat is offline   Reply With Quote