Quote:
|
Originally Posted by seaneeboy
Originally Posted by timewarrior2001
I admit on more than one occasion I have commited common assault on a teenager. And actually yes I am quite proud of it, because the litte **** needed a lesson in humility.
I have no time for the tarquin has a behavioural problem brigade, what tarquin needs is a bloody good thrashing off someone.
I was well pleased that the 13 year old was jailed ...
Perhaps once he's had a few good beatings in prison he will start to learn
|
Perhaps TW can expand on what happened?
Escpecially when it sounds like the 13 year old involved was found guilty of a custodial offence.
Could it have been that TW was defending someone against this 13 year old?
Or are you saying that if someone under 18 attacks you, then you shouldn't defend yourself?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by seaneeboy
Because society and our culture has in the whole changed massivly in the past 50 years?!
You're surely not suggesting that the only possible reason that things aren't the same as 50 years ago (which, by my reconing was the end of the second world war - hardly the best example of society) is because of corporal punishment being taken out of schools?
|
Ok, so what has changed to make that NSPCC statement to be completely inaccurate 50+ years ago but valid now?
How is it that millions of children were exposed to corporal punishment, but didn't go on to become violent thugs, but you slap a kid today and it'll start bullying others?