View Single Post
Old 15-03-2005, 23:59   #12
handyman
Permanently Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nr Carnforth
Age: 49
Services: M6 Keele
Posts: 5,462
handyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny star
handyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny star
Send a message via MSN to handyman
Re: unbiased answer needed NTL vs SKY PQ

Well according to the DTV courses I went on the DTV standards for data compression are identical for Cable DTV, SAT DTV and Terrestrial DTV. Under normal conditions the picture quality should be identical between the 3 sources as they all have to adhere to the standards set down when the DTv licences where set-up.

And regardless of what anyone says everytime I see ITV1 on My folks 32" widescreen (SKY) on a saturday night It looks horrid. Its all pixallated.

As For variable compression rates this is true but sky should have the same issues Ie. 8mbit multiplex with four channles in and one suddenly shows a live action crowd shot then its bandwidth requirements will rocket. However low bandwidth channels such as QVC should alwyas balance this out.
handyman is offline   Reply With Quote