Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Incognitas
I would like to point out that at the time of of the original incident the person concerned was 9 years old...At the time he was too young to be prosecuted and indeed the law would regard him as being a victim AT THAT TIME because no 9 year old should be able to obtain such easy access to a site.The company were negligent.. and any child of 9 is deemed as not having the ability to view matters as an adult.
What ever else has happened in the interim has no bearing on the case.
I have to say that when I first read this story I thought the same as everyone else.That is until I reread it and noted how old he was when the accident occured.  |
And I would like to point out that at the age of 9 I was not out of sight of either my parents or a responsible adult. Perhaps he should have sued his parents (when they are released) and take away the money they made from their coke dealing?
9 years old... can't be expected to be responsible? Then he shouldn't be out on his own.
Jeeez, whatever next? "He ran out in front of a car, so the driver was negligent in knocking him over"?
He should get nothing.