Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lyndonbarry
Just re-tried it from the source as suggested
Code:
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:38:10 UTC
1st 128K took 3610 ms = 36308 Bytes/sec = approx 302 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 9031 ms = 14514 Bytes/sec = approx 121 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 8531 ms = 15364 Bytes/sec = approx 128 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 4625 ms = 28340 Bytes/sec = approx 236 kbits/sec
Does that look like 1mb to you guys?
Approaching Terminal Confusion, please stand back |
No, this is
Code:
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 22:13:58 GMT
1st 128K took 1062 ms = 123420 Bytes/sec = approx 1027 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 1047 ms = 125188 Bytes/sec = approx 1042 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 1078 ms = 121588 Bytes/sec = approx 1012 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 1063 ms = 123304 Bytes/sec = approx 1026 kbits/sec
But yours looks bad even for 300K did you have other things using the internet during your test?