Quote:
Originally posted by Russ D
This makes very interesting reading.
Although we don't know all the facts in this case, would it be fair to say that had the situation been a 33 year old man having sex with a 14 year girl, would the defence have the nerve to say "The girl was the instigator"?
|
They do it all the time where the man responsible has no choice but to acknowledge the he had sex with the child.
Since it's impossible for a woman to force a man to have sex with her, it's a reasonable assumption that the boy was a willing participent, if not the instigator.
As for telling his father, well fool! He'll not be getting his leg over again any time soon.
