Quote:
|
Originally Posted by andyl
Why not?  |
Because isn't that what you have been arguing about all this time? Judging everyone individually, and not stereotyping across the board because one example fits an agenda?
An example of why not... Some Islamic scholars are terrorists. More than one, but not all. Does that mean we should ban all Islamic scholars? No, because that one example does not make the rule. You judge everyone independantly
Everyone keeps focusing on "looks like a terrorist"... That's rubbish. Radical domestic activists can pose as much of threat to the health and security of the nation, and they look nothing like an Islamic scholar.
If the Security Services see someone poses a threat to the lives of other people, then they should be able to deal with it with impunity, and not have to worry about the MCB or anyone else because the guy happens to be Muslim.
People seem to think nowadays the only terrorists now are Muslim. Well, they should go into London on May Day... Hang around Huntingdon Life Sciences a bit (or Oxford University now
)
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by me283
It reminds me a bit of when I was very young,
<snip>
|
And if they did ignore the warning, and something did happen, they'd get blamed for that too. (Like with the 9/11 commission)