View Single Post
Old 09-03-2005, 00:06   #81
ScaredWebWarrior
Guest
 
Location: Midlands
Services: NTL Phone/Cable
Posts: n/a
Re: Abu hamza attacked

Quote:
Originally Posted by dr wadd
First, I suggest you start to consider carefully what accusations you throw around in a public forum. You are sailing dangerously close to the wind there.
First of all you don't like me generalising. Now you don't like me picking on you. Make up your mind.
And while we're here, I'm just exercising freedom of speech - if you feel accused by that then that's your problem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dr wadd
But once again, you clearly demonstrate that you consider someone with a differing opinion to you to be a potential terrorist. I suggest you volunteer to be the post-child for FUD.
The only thing I'm demonstrating is that your argument has fallen apart.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dr wadd
When you stop throwing around wild allegations you may have a point, until then you are simply a hypocrit.
I have made no wild allegations, and even if I had, that would not make me a hypocrite. http://www.freesearch.co.uk/dictionary/hypocrite

Quote:
Originally Posted by dr wadd
Ok, so if this is incitement, it does make me wonder what sort of person you are. If something as non-threatening as burning a flag is enough for incitement, I have to ask, do you have any degree of self-control? You see, for incitement to work it relies on those being incited to lose control. If it works on you as incitement, does that suggest you are rational?
You are the kind of person that would burn a flag to make a point. You would like to make that point in a way that maximally upset someone.
You would do that because you would like to cause that someone to 'lose control' because then you could try to claim the moral high ground.
I am the kind of person who, quite rationally, points these facts out and then it is you that makes the accusations.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dr wadd
Really, so the authorities have been lying about all the accusations against him? It's just that I swear I could recall a bigger list of charges than simply flag burning.
What pipe are you smoking? Did anything I say shorten that list? No.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dr wadd
Yes, it is, which is ironic considering that if you got your way and the burning of the flag was banned the country would actually have had a freedom removed. Contradictory perhaps?
No contradiction at all. Just goes to show that you completely fail to understand the concept of freedom of speech. It's not an absolute freedom - there is not such thing.

Do come back if you think you can demonstrate that you do understand what it really means.
  Reply With Quote