Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dr wadd
Yes, because I disagree with you I am a sad troll.  Perhaps you should join a debating club. |
You mean we're NOT debating here? My understanding of the definition of that word says we are.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=debate
In any case I'm not the only one you are in disagreement with, so the fact that you're trying to argue (blindly) with all comers is looking rather troll-like.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dr wadd
I think your last post amply demonstrates just how narrow minded you are. "Deal with people like you." Well, you've certainly nailed your true colours to the post, anyone whose opinion differs to yours must be a terrorist |
I never said "people like you" - I said "with you" - so I wasn't generalising, I was specifically picking
you out as a possible terrorist suspect.
And since you seem keen to dispel the idea that you might be a troll, you're just adding fuel to the fire. (lol. we're back to burning!)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dr wadd
Now why don`t you step back from this thread a bit and read it again. Why don`t you pay close attention to the fact that this is an argument as to how to use a flag effectively in protest, and which started out with the point that banning the burning of flags as a means of protest is not an acceptable means of free speech.
|
I don't need to 'step back'. I've been following it quite closely.
You may have been trying to espouse the efficacy of using a flag to insult a nation, the rest of us were definitely defending the flag.
Free speech doesn't give anyone the right to say whatever they want, or to express themselves in whatever manner they please. Anyone who thinks that clearly doesn't understand the concept at all.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dr wadd
Now please explain how a knowledge of how to use psychology and a disagreement over a point of symbolism makes someone either a troll or a suitable candidate for anti-terrorism legislation. I`ll be waiting, I could do with a laugh.
|
Now you're trying to make it sound really intellectual - psychology is it? No - nothing of the sort. You're defending incitement as a valid form of free speech.
Since that's the kind of thinking that put Abu Hamza where he is, I do indeed think that makes you a candidate to join him.
There you go - you didn't have to wait long, and if you want to laugh, go right ahead. It's
still a free country!