View Single Post
Old 04-03-2005, 16:19   #961
ian@huth
Inactive
 
ian@huth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Huthwaite, Nottinghamshire
Services: VM 10Mb, TU, 1xSky HD, 2xSky+ (HD,all packs, sports & movies) 2xDVD PVR's, Freesat Freeview & other
Posts: 4,536
ian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronze
ian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronze
Re: [Merged] *ALL* ntl Cap Discussion In Here Please.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hans Gruber
It's possible it could occur in the future, I agree. But, not as of now, or any time soon. Of course ISPs will continue to upgrade equipment, so who knows, that day may never come.

P.S. the people who download a lot of illegal software are also not alone, but browsing in the middle of the night does not make you an average customer, hence your needs should not be catered for, going by your earlier logic.
ISPs will continue to upgrade equipment if they can afford to, but can they?

You have quoted one bit of my signature so I'll quote another. "There is no such thing as the average man (or woman)." Think about it.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hans Gruber
No offense, but I trust Nildram's sums better than I trust your insanely 1 sided calculations. I don't see why it bothers you, you should be glad to see the back of heavy downloaders, why are you trying to convince people to stay with NTL? Also, I'm not one of those heavy downloaders.
Why are they insanely one sided? Just because they don't agree with your ideas doesn't make them wrong.

I am not trying to persaude anyone to stay with NTL, just trying to put balanced, researched points into a discussion that has too many badly thought out arguments.
ian@huth is offline