View Single Post
Old 04-03-2005, 15:19   #946
ian@huth
Inactive
 
ian@huth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Huthwaite, Nottinghamshire
Services: VM 10Mb, TU, 1xSky HD, 2xSky+ (HD,all packs, sports & movies) 2xDVD PVR's, Freesat Freeview & other
Posts: 4,536
ian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronze
ian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronze
Re: [Merged] *ALL* ntl Cap Discussion In Here Please.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hans Gruber
I could completely live with Nildram's cap, It seems like they actually thought about it and really suits everyone apart from ridiculously heavy downloaders. If you need/want to you could get well over 200gb a month, without affecting anyone's browsing. It's the kind of cap NTL needs to think about inplementing.
That shows a lot of technical knowledge, I don't think, if you think all Nildrams customers can get well over 200gb a month without affecting anyone's browsing. Why have Nildram introduced caps? What will happen if all those dissatisfied NTL customers move over to them? How soon before their caps get lower?
ian@huth is offline