View Single Post
Old 04-03-2005, 14:42   #105
orangebird
Inactive
 
orangebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hampshire
Services: Yeah Baby! ;)
Posts: 5,684
orangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny star
orangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny star
Re: Scrap TV license fees?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
I have never needed or wanted to go to an art gallery either. But I still think that it should be part-funded by the taxpayer. I am not disabled but my money should be used to help those that are.

You do not have an absolute right to decide what you should pay for all the time.

<snip>

Don't take this the wrong way Damien, but at 18, you really haven't got a clue.

Last month, I paid over £1k in tax an NI. To go towards stupid bloody child trust funds, and free housing for pikeys who can't be arsed to work amongst other. I strongly believe I should have a right to decide whether more of my hard earned wages goes towards a broadcasts of a Corporation that I have no interest in, just because I choose to own a tv .
orangebird is offline