Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Graham
Point proven? Hardly, unless you can actually *demonstrate* a causal link between the two which I very much doubt.
|
You seem to be ignoring generally accepted history
linky
linky
linky etc....etc....
Quote:
At Munich in 1938, Chamberlain had appeased Hitler by giving him the Sudetenland areas of Czechoslovakia, but in March 1939, Chamberlain promised to defend Poland if the Nazis invaded.
The main reason for this was because on 15 March 1939, Hitler had invaded Czechoslovakia †“ a non-German country. People realised that appeasement had failed. They realised that Hitler wanted to rule the world, and would only be stopped by war.
|
As for you saying 'prove a link' between appeasement and subsequent nazi, that can't conclusively be done (you would need a paralell universe) but it is generally historically accepted that the link is there.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by graham
Yes, Ramrod, it's *meant* to be fallacious! I'm trying to point out that your "it's worth a try" argument is *also* fallacious!
And the fallacy is the "Burden of Proof" ie that your claim "it's worth a try" is attempting to put the onus on me to *disprove* that claim, when, in fact, the requirement is that *you* prove your case.
|
So my saying that perhaps watching the muslim community more closely is 'worth a try' is the same as you saying that they should be shot?!
I think it's safe to say the line could be drawn somewhere
before shooting them.
edit.............I'm outta here
