Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NitroNutter
Dont know where you got drivers licence from car tax aka vehicle licence duty was brought into the discusion and I pointed out that is also yet another unfair taxation method. Drivers licence is purely a permit to drive. Car tax is a fixed fee no matter how much you use your car, unfair on many who subsidise those who hammer our roads, kind of like the way some users hammer unlimited internet disrupting those who use unlimited internet within reason.
As your only choice is to pay a tv licence or not own any kind of broadcast accepting equipment which is now extended to computers hooked up to the internet, it is an undemocratic fee applied to all despite wetehr they wish to have BBC or not.
We dont watch BBC much at all if it was an option to pay £10 a month subscription or not have bbc we would yes do without bbc. It is not an option and therefore does not fit in a democratic society which we are supposed to be. The way it is forced upon us pay, go to court and get fined extensivly or have no tv is none other than legalised extortion, the only reason it being legal is because the government say so. So the government is yes imo guilty of extortion because they are the law.
You want BBC you pay for it. I do not owe you BBC so I dont see why I should subsidise your pleasure.
|
I never mentioned VED, or 'car tax'. I drew a parallel between a driver's licence and a TV licence. As you say, a drivers licence is a permit to drive. A TV licence is a permit to watch TV. Simple, really.
It is not undemocratic to impose something on everyone. Democracy is the rule of the majority, not the consensus of the whole. Therefore the majority is entitled to impose its will on the whole. The TV licence, as an Act of Parliament, is therefore quite democratic.