View Single Post
Old 01-03-2005, 11:06   #13
Stuart
-
 
Stuart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere
Services: Virgin for TV and Internet, BT for phone
Posts: 26,546
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Re: Firefox Security?????

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul
Releasing a new version instead of a patch would (to me at least) point to more than a couple of little holes being plugged :erm
I totally agree with the last two posts, well said both of you
It depends. I read an interview with one of the Project managers for Windows XP Service Pack 2 (v. nice looking woman, the interview had a picture). They asked her about the size of Service Pack 2, and apparently, the bulk of it was due to stuff that needed to be changed because they had patched other stuff.. It might be the same with firefox. If they patch a core function within the program, they may need to patch all the parts of the program that rely on that core function.
Stuart is offline   Reply With Quote