View Single Post
Old 27-02-2005, 22:00   #110
punky
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Age: 44
Posts: 14,750
punky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aura
punky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aura
Re: UK General Election 2005

Quote:
Originally Posted by Incognitas
Oh and someone was muttering about the inequality of car insurance being gender biased in favour of women.Tell me,how many men benefit by being included on their wife's/partners insurance? If it gets the same treatment as pensions did them then these men will be paying more for their insurance anyway.
That is what I said to Andyl. Sometimes fairer isn't in everyone's best interests.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Punky post #105
...rather than improving men's lives, it will harm them because they'll be paying more, than the sexual-discriminatory previous system. Men and women will be paying more, and so be poorer.
And men don't benefit from having women on their insurance, women are disadvantaged from having men on there (unless the woman in question has a bad record).

Still, this is getting OT. I mentioned it as an example to support an on-topic point, not to re-ignite another gender flamewar
punky is offline   Reply With Quote