View Single Post
Old 26-02-2005, 11:55   #138
ian@huth
Inactive
 
ian@huth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Huthwaite, Nottinghamshire
Services: VM 10Mb, TU, 1xSky HD, 2xSky+ (HD,all packs, sports & movies) 2xDVD PVR's, Freesat Freeview & other
Posts: 4,536
ian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronze
ian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronze
Re: Gatso camera case

Quote:
Originally Posted by sonygeezer
snip>

Under current rules, a fixed camera can be installed only if at least four collisions per kilometre involving death or injury have happened in the past three years. For mobile cameras, it is two collisions. Police must also prove that at least 20 per cent of drivers are breaking the limit.
How do they prove 20% are speeding?

There has been a lot of talk in this thread about what gatsos do and don't do. No matter what we think about gatsos, their use, placement and reason for being there

Breaking the speed limit is an offence and punishable

People aren't really complaining about gatsos, they are complaining because anything that interferes with their disregard of the law should not exist.
ian@huth is offline   Reply With Quote