Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ian@huth
The contract is with a named person or persons but is for installation of the services at a specific address and any court would take the view that the contract is tied as much to the address as to the person.
|
If the installation is free then that part isn't technically a contract under UK law as there hasn`t been an exchange.
Further, I disagree that a court would take the view that the contract is tied to a specific address, if only for the fact that NTL continue the same contract at a new property if they can supply the services there. If they cancelled the original contract and started a new one after a property move then they might have an argument, but they do not.