FGS just to stop this and so that this thread doesn't keep going on and on about about this stuff doesn't it seem interesting to anyone that this is the same guidelines, etc, that are applying currently. 'Soft' capping, 1GB/day suggested. Although no doubt those really nailing it will probably be spoken to with some more enthusiasm than previously due to the higher potential to degrade the networks with their higher speeds.
Did anyone actually bother to read what was posted elsewhere regarding this, for example that this usage is a 'guideline' until later in the year when firm capping will come in as the systems to police it aren't ready yet (as posted on ntlhell).
http://forums.ntlhell.co.uk/index.ph...topic=7280&hl=
Quote:
|
This will not be monitored til latter in the year and customers will be informed when this comes in. Options supplied to those exceeding limits. "We will continue to run campaigns with heavy users".
|
When hard capping is properly enforced yes it will count on all traffic.
Now if we can get this thread away from capping it'd be wonderful. Any more questions I'll be in my orifice, following the example of various people here.