Quote:
|
Originally Posted by monkeybreath
/ points out that he has studied contract law and will be writing LLB after his name come July  |
Good for you MB.
You have to remember though that most court cases are fought with the qualified legal representatives on both sided thinking that they know the law and are right in their interpretation of it. One of them is usually found to be wrong but that in itself does not prove that they were wrong, only that the final decision maker has judged them to be wrong and that decision maker could equally be wrong.
They are only wrong though until such time as someone higher says they are right.
Charles Dickens may have had the right idea when he said the law is an ass.
Going back to the scenario I posted in post #15. If that is all that was said in the ordering phone call and NTL didn't send out a copy of the T&Cs, what contract would exist in Law?