So does this mean that anyone can kick a homosexual to death and just claim that he was being accosted?I can't believe that anyone would get away with uncorroborated testimony like that.So what if someone makes the attempt? It's not a defence that I think anyone else would get away with.The judge must have been mad.
So the next time a man accosts a woman she can kill him and claim he accosted her?I think not.
Unless he was actually claiming he was frightened that he was going to be killed I can't see how it is any kind of defence.