View Single Post
Old 18-02-2005, 13:53   #711
orangebird
Inactive
 
orangebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hampshire
Services: Yeah Baby! ;)
Posts: 5,684
orangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny star
orangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny star
Re: [Merged] *ALL* ntl Cap Discussion In Here Please.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cr80123
Do all these people who are for the cap work for NTLl?
No, but I do. I'm not for the cap, or against the cap. I am all for ntl making money though and keeping me in a job.

Quote:
Do they have a profit related pay scheme? As far as I can see that's the only excuse for them. The sole reason they want to limit bandwidth is so they can cram more people onto their network and thus make more money. NTL will lose market share if they implement this.
Then I suggest you look for another excuse. PRP doesn't happen at ntl. ntl have had the 'cap' in place for ages now. The customers numbers are up. Your theory is full of holes.
orangebird is offline