View Single Post
Old 18-02-2005, 13:20   #703
orangebird
Inactive
 
orangebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hampshire
Services: Yeah Baby! ;)
Posts: 5,684
orangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny star
orangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny star
Re: [Merged] *ALL* ntl Cap Discussion In Here Please.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PC_Arcade
I don't think that would be argued, the question is why some ISPs are able to offer "sensible" (ie larger) caps on higher speeds and STILL have to pay BT their share (internal bandwidth) when NTL who own their network seem to be unable to provide either the speed or the volume usage, even though theoretically it would cost them less.
Unless you take into account that ntl also have to pay for the maintenance of their own networks too.....
orangebird is offline