Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Graham
Yes, I did. *None* of which says "the Police do checks on people working with children".
The point is that many extra workers had to be drafted in to supplement those working at the Criminal Records Bureau in order to do all the checks the government all of a sudden required after Soham. Those workers cost money. Money (and workers) are resource. So resources that could have been used *by* the Police were being used elsewhere.
|
Thanks for that, now I've got a vision of goverment pen pushers running round after burglars and muggers!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Graham
In which case you could have made it clearer since it followed immediately after a comment that was definitely directed at me.
|
I thought I had by giving a line break and discussing something which you hadn't said.
I'd sing a song right now, but you'd probably think that was about you...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Graham
*I* have more sense...!
|
So rather than ensure that things get done to
your standards you decline the chance, oh well, that's your choice I suppose.
Stick with the tried and tested "I don't like it, I can't give any evidence to back up why it would be a bad thing, and I don't see why I should suggest something better" argument.