View Single Post
Old 14-02-2005, 13:35   #67
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 49
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: I think this is a stupid Idea

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
True, when you look at rules for the siting of cameras. "For a site to qualify for a fixed camera, it must have had at least four crashes that involve death or serious injury and/or at least eight crashes involving personal injuries in the past three years over a kilometre distance."
Also:
Quote:
There has been a site survey by a road safety engineer and there are no other obvious, practical measures to improve road safety along this stretch of road
So, speed cameras must not be put in places where other measures can be taken to improve road safety.
So why were some installed on a brand new dual carrigeway, or is the highways agency deliberately building dangerous roads?
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Incognitas
Siigghhhhhhhh!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaccers
I want a commisioner to hold the police to account and get them to do their jobs properly.
If a commisioner pledged to reign in the police and make them do their jobs properly targetting dangerous roads rather than roads with high income, increasing police patrols, tackling serious crime, then I'd vote for them, and if they failed, I'd vote them out.
Something I can't do with the PA!
So come on Howard, hurry up and win the election so we can get the country sorted again.
Xaccers is offline   Reply With Quote