View Single Post
Old 01-02-2005, 16:09   #8
Chris
Trollsplatter
Cable Forum Team
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 38,300
Chris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden aura
Chris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden aura
Re: Gatso camera case

Quote:
Originally Posted by scastle
Technicality? They sent him a Notice of Intent to Prosecute (to find out who the driver was). He refused to answer. He refused to go to court. Then,


I don't understand why he will not reply to this. They can then proceed with the case, he can present his evidence and the court will rule either for or against him.

I personally think he should be charged with Contempt of Court.
Agreed. At the moment it's just looking like he's exploring all the technicalities that might get him off the charge. Refusing to identify himself as the driver is a bit lame if he is genuinely interested in contesting the camera evidence. Kind of looks like an insurance policy in case he loses.
Chris is offline   Reply With Quote