View Single Post
Old 01-02-2005, 16:07   #7
Stuart
-
 
Stuart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere
Services: Virgin for TV and Internet, BT for phone
Posts: 26,546
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Re: Gatso camera case

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
So it looks like the filth will get off on a technicality and we wont here this guys evidence in court.

Technicality? They sent him a Notice of Intent to Prosecute (to find out who the driver was). He refused to answer. He refused to go to court. Then,
Quote:
The Crown Prosecution Service has consequently ruled that the Gatso evidence is not relevant to the case until the matter of who was driving has been determined.
I don't understand why he will not reply to this. They can then proceed with the case, he can present his evidence and the court will rule either for or against him.

I personally think he should be charged with Contempt of Court.
Stuart is offline   Reply With Quote