View Single Post
Old 26-01-2005, 14:15   #505
Neil
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,058
Neil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze array
Neil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze array
Re: [Merged] *ALL* ntl Cap Discussion In Here Please.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrlipring
ok, so the 90 bucks is spread over 2 years, not one.

Really though, i'm hoping that my business lasts more than 2 years, so it doesn't bother me. If a 2 year contract is the only minus point over the residential package, then it ain't all that bad, is it? My point still stands, residential customers are getting a worse deal, and surely business users don't generally go for the TV package? I'll be working from home, so i'll probably opt for a basic package, but in general, there can't be many businesses who've opted for the tv package, and i'd imagine that that's where NTL really make their money.
But surely you are going about this the wrong way??

You are griping at the way ntl have done/are doing things, yet you are rewarding them with a further 2 years of your custom....

The only way companies begin to understand their failings is when people vote with their wallets & go to (in this case) ADSL/BT/Sky etc etc.

I certainly wouldn't put money in ntl's pocket if I was in your situation, I would take the easy route of finding a nice reliable/uncapped ADSL provider, with an equally nice 1 month contract, & give them my money.

Hang on.....that's exactly what I did do....
Neil is offline