View Single Post
Old 24-01-2005, 13:01   #442
Chris
Trollsplatter
Cable Forum Team
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 38,300
Chris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden aura
Chris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden aura
Re: [Merged] ntl "cap"-*ALL* Discussion In Here Please.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doofy
I have a question bearing in mind i do not understand any of this looks like NTL are gonna enforce the caps to get rid of the heavy users, So if the heavy users go to lets say AOL with no caps on cable, isnt that still through the NTL ntework? which means NTL achieved absolutely nothing. And how come aol can offer unlimited via NTL but NTL cannot. As i said i dont really understand any of this, please bear that in mind when flaming this one
I think it's more about NTL choosing not to have an uncapped service than being unable to do so. AOL has just taken a different view. I would imagine that AOL-via NTL customers are small enough in number for it to make little difference anyway.

TBH I'm not sure why anyone would get AOL by cable when they can get it direct from NTL. Even with a cap, NTL's speeds are faster, and soon to be even more so, while AOL is apparently offering a measly 512k, presumably so as not to annoy their ADSL customers.
Chris is offline