View Single Post
Old 21-01-2005, 18:11   #404
Stuart
-
 
Stuart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere
Services: Virgin for TV and Internet, BT for phone
Posts: 26,546
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Re: [Merged] ntl "cap"-*ALL* Discussion In Here Please.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis
Very good point as like many other things the customers who pay up are subsidising the loss making customers, various businesses work like this, but however for some reason a few on broadband have decided this is unfair practice.

I believe the point was made that the banks will pitch their rates so that the customers they profit from will cover the customers they lose from? I take that to mean that the interest rates go up if too many people default on their loans. Put simply, they put their prices up to cover the losses from some customers.

Applying this example to NTL, do you think broadband prices should go up to cover the losses they are making on the top 5% of their customers?

BTW, as I had it explained to me, NTL actually might a slight loss on ALL 1.5 Meg users, but that is more than covered by the profits from the 300K customers.
Stuart is offline