Thread: Iran is next ?
View Single Post
Old 17-01-2005, 09:25   #12
BBKing
R.I.P.
 
BBKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Services: 20Mb VM CM, Virgin TV
Posts: 5,983
BBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny star
BBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny star
Send a message via ICQ to BBKing
Re: Iran is next ?

Quote:
makes me wonder about there cheap cars
Excuse me, you're not confusing North Korea with South Korea at all? I haven't seen many North Korean cars on sale, even in London, where they'd probably be fashionable ('Darling, I've got this wonderful three-cylinder paraffin powered 4x4 from Pyong-Yang Motors, it's quite the in-thing on the school run'). Anyway, we don't invade places that actually have WMDs, it'd be far too dangerous.

Invading Iran would be a great idea, we've already f-ed off the Sunni Muslims by invading Iraq and are about to deny them the vote while giving it to the Shias (resulting in Shia-domination* and shortly afterwards civil war), so lets annoy the Shias as well and have both sides horning into Iraq attacking us. I'd like to say it was impossible but the ignorance and lunacy of the Bush regime have yet to display any boundaries of common sense.

Mind you, what will stop them is lack of manpower. The US isn't big enough to fight two wars.

Pointless fact - al-Qaeda have no links to the Iranian theocracy, as they had no links to Saddam Hussein. In fact they hate Iran as much as they hated Saddam.

*Iranian links to the people likely to win the Iraqi half-election are fairly well known, I hink.
BBKing is offline   Reply With Quote