View Single Post
Old 12-01-2005, 17:43   #260
ian@huth
Inactive
 
ian@huth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Huthwaite, Nottinghamshire
Services: VM 10Mb, TU, 1xSky HD, 2xSky+ (HD,all packs, sports & movies) 2xDVD PVR's, Freesat Freeview & other
Posts: 4,536
ian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronze
ian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronze
Re: NTL cap limit

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil
I'm not disagreeing with you, I'm just saying that you are not in a position to say that all peeps who registered pre Feb 03 are unnaffected.

As you know, I'm totally against the way they have gone about it, & would also like to see ntl (or any company for that matter) make it stick in court.
Whether the terms & conditions were fair or not would have to be decided in the courts but who would risk the expense of a court hearing if their broadband service was terminated?

If a customers broadband contract was cancelled because of the breach of the "soft" cap there is every chance that it could be terminated because of the breach of other sections of the T&Cs which have existed from the start of broadband.
ian@huth is offline