View Single Post
Old 11-01-2005, 23:29   #40
Bifta
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eglinton, Co. Derry
Posts: 7,640
Bifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny star
Bifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny star
Re: Details of New Apple Mac Mini

Quote:
Originally Posted by gooner4life
Yeah granted but it wouldnt look as nice, have the apple quality or run OS-X
If I'm spending 2 grand, I want something that's going to PERFORM like 2 grands worth of machine, not end up paying a premium for how it looks.

I'll not deny that apple USED to make great, powerful (and expensive) machines, however, x86-64 architecture seems to have put them in the shadows, now they're selling based on their historical reputation alone and not on the performance of their hardware, which is sad really. They're supposed to be innovators but they're being left behind (in the computing market).
Bifta is offline   Reply With Quote