View Single Post
Old 11-01-2005, 18:01   #239
ian@huth
Inactive
 
ian@huth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Huthwaite, Nottinghamshire
Services: VM 10Mb, TU, 1xSky HD, 2xSky+ (HD,all packs, sports & movies) 2xDVD PVR's, Freesat Freeview & other
Posts: 4,536
ian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronze
ian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronze
Re: NTL cap limit

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil
Calm down dear, it's only a discussion forum!

I'm not suggesting people shouldn't be responsible for their actions, just that ntl moved the goalposts, & that's not what people signed up for.
LOL, any change in terms and conditions is a moving of the goalpoasts and not what people signed up for.

The speeds that NTL broadband customers are getting now are, for the majority of its customers, not what they signed for but are welcomed by them.

The terms and conditions that people did sign for contained details of how those terms and conditions could be altered in the future.

Whether any term or condition is legally binding is a matter for the courts. It does not matter how much NTL or anyone else pay for legal opinion and representation, it is a matter of what the courts decide.
ian@huth is offline