Quote:
Originally Posted by jem
Although ’the shit flying everywhere’ is a direct consequence of the legal action.
Imagine that his action had been upheld it would mean that his (alleged) accusers are forbidden to tell their story, forbidden to claim what they say had happened to them, forbidden to seek legal redress, forbidden to seek help.
You are saying that if you are rich and influential and have the right connections, then you can get away with anything and shut down any complaints.
No, just no, that is wrong. That can’t hold. If, If Walliams has done what has been alleged, and if there is sufficient evidence to merit a prosecution, then so be it.
|
And how interested is the media in Joe Bloggs down the road? That's the difference, not wealth, influence, or connections.
Why should stories about somebody's private life be splashed all over the media?
About time that "kiss and tell" stories were banned.