Thread: David Walliams named as celebrity who tried to block publication of sexual misconduct
View Single Post
Old Today, 19:36   #13
jem
cf.geek
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: SE London (Bromley, which is the best borough)
Services: None - well none with VM!
Posts: 600
jem is a pillar of societyjem is a pillar of societyjem is a pillar of societyjem is a pillar of societyjem is a pillar of societyjem is a pillar of societyjem is a pillar of societyjem is a pillar of societyjem is a pillar of societyjem is a pillar of societyjem is a pillar of societyjem is a pillar of societyjem is a pillar of societyjem is a pillar of societyjem is a pillar of societyjem is a pillar of societyjem is a pillar of societyjem is a pillar of societyjem is a pillar of societyjem is a pillar of society
Re: David Walliams named as celebrity who tried to block publication of sexual miscon
Quote:
Originally Posted by papa smurf View Post
if this goes to court he's screwed,every news channel is "discussing" this, talk shows discussing it,as far as joe public is concerned he's guilty of something
If ‘what' goes to Court? There have been some accusations, so far no charges, so far, it’s all vague.

In fact if he hadn’t tried to bury it with an injunction, which was never going to work, it probably would never have attracted the attention it has. Now the second he is charged with something specific then all talk show speculation etc. plus, incidentally, comments on UK based sites (such as this one) ends immediately.

Personally, having done jury service many times, I think you underestimate ‘joe public’. If , and it is a massive ‘if’, he is charged with some offence and end up in Court, no, he will get a fair hearing.
__________________
"I believe in an open mind, but not so open that your brains fall out"
Arthur Hays Sulzberger
jem is online now   Reply With Quote