Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymoss
Thats ok Hugh hitting someone twice with a bottle is nothing compared to that. It is good he got to walk free and no way imposes a further risk to the public and will not see this as an "I got away with a violent assault" I am happy justice was done..
Sarcasm mode off .
Dunno how an assault with a bottle twice only counts as affray the injustice there is in the CPS and the charges
With the judge saying "Brown avoided immediate jail time, with the judge emphasizing that commercial success does not grant preferential treatment under the law." I think that is exactly what happened here it is not like he gave someone a slap he hit them with a bottle and there was a 2nd person charge so it was 2 of them causing the incident . But Tommy is a bad bad man Chris Brown must be lovely
Oh and Hugh there is this
Oh and this
You really should have fact checked
---------- Post added at 04:41 ---------- Previous post was at 04:37 ----------
What difference does where he committed the other crimes make? it is a criminal history just like Tommys where he committed the crime is irrelevant. Just front it out Hugh you should have checked first and using Browns suspended sentence as a way to show how much worse Tommy is failed
|
I wouldnt worry 'Tommy' is innocent. It's Stephen Yaxley-Lennon that has been found guilty (again).