Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
Some applications of Zionism are undoubtedly racist the “we just want somewhere safe” application is extremely narrow, the expansionist biblical Israel being a maximalist interpretation.
Either way what this motion does is allows activists in the Green Party to remove officials who don’t agree with “party policy” culminating in the deselection of candidates who don’t agree with it. Andy Wightman, a former MSP in the Scottish Greens, ostracised for not bowing to the gender cult has posted about this on X.
Where does someone go these days if they don’t have a view on the Middle East, think men are men, and just don’t want nuclear power, want clean oceans and less fossil fuel consumption?
|
Well quite. There are Zionists and there are Zionists, just as there are Calvinists and there are Calvinists. Political and religious ideologies are often broad churches.
Helpfully, the Green Party motion is abundantly clear on its definition of Zionism. The document they passed is here:
https://static1.squarespace.com/stat...c+A5+amend.pdf
And helpfully, you only have to read the 4-line synopsis at the top to understand without any doubt that the Green Party of England and Wales has adopted, as its official policy, to advocate for the abolition of the entire state of Israel and the establishment of a State of Palestine on all of that territory.