Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
Yes. He didn't want the motion tabled at all and wanted an amendment which explicitly stated Jewish people would not be targeted for attending synagogues added, that amendement didn't pass.
Polanski didn't vote or campaign either way. He ignored it entirely to go and campaign in Holborn ahead of the by-election this Thursday there. He clearly didn't want to get involved at all, despite being the leader of the party, which is quite something.
He just doesn't want to make any hard decisions or get involved. Baffling.
|
Polanski is a useful idiot who is being used by a bunch of raging anti-semites to Jew-wash their agenda into some form of respectability.
---------- Post added at 10:44 ---------- Previous post was at 10:41 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy
Except one is an inconsequential Jewish politician in Britain with no power to enforce a Palestinian state or even influence the situation there and the other is a wanted criminal, actually brazenly ensuring there can only be one state, to me that's a world of difference but of course ymmv, happy to clarify for you
|
Again, if only Polanski had come up with this idea you might have a point, but he didn’t. Nor did his party.
‘From the river to the sea’ isn’t just a catchy slogan. It is the broadly held belief within Palestinianism - shared by Hamas, though, notably, not the PA in the West Bank - that Israel is entirely illegitimate and only one state, a Palestinian one, should exist.
The fact that Polanski and the Greens are not able to implement their Palestinian one-state solution while Netanyahu is having a go at implementing his does not magnify nor diminish the wrongness of either position.