View Single Post
Old Today, 11:07   #4
Damien
Remoaner
Cable Forum Mod
 
Damien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,987
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Re: British Justice and Sentences

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymoss View Post
sorry but that totally misses the point. I am not arguing his sentence is to excessive what am arguing is if you can get 20 years for fraud and not burying a number bodies then a child rapist should never again see the light of day (think this anyway) it is the imbalance
I agree, but I think we get odd cases like this where the funeral director is facing multiple stacked charges? So 20 years is the result of multiple sentences, whereas the rapist in your scenario is one sentence.

That said, I would want higher than 13 years there anyway. Murder, violence and offences against children should get much longer than most other crimes.
Damien is offline   Reply With Quote