[damien c]

Originally Posted by jem

OK fine, but the video clips you link to don't exactly match your deathless prose description of what happened does it? A ‘white’ lad being attacked by four ‘africans?’, when a woman police office wades in (without identifying herself, despite being in uniform) and just arrested the 'white lad’ for no reason. It gives the impression of this ‘white lad’ laying on the floor, having the proverbial kicked out of him by four Africans’ when the police turn up and basically say, ‘right off you go lads, we’ll take it form here, and arrest the ‘white lad’ for basically damaging the ‘Aficans' shoes’.

Except that’s not what the video shows it is?

I saw one person attempting to hold two others apart, attempting to defuse the situation. I see one, maybe two people assault ‘white lad’, knock him down and run off, clearly pursued by another police officer.

The ‘white lad’ does clearly assault the police office, which is why he was arrested, oh and clearly was resisting being put in the car.

Now self defence is NOT a claim to not be arrested, it is a defence against conviction.

Hypothetically, I live in an isolated cottage, and have a valid firearms licence. One night my home is broken into, I fear for my life and threaten the assailants with my shotgun’, they ignore it and advance and I shoot them dead.

I immediately call the police, who arrive and find two dead bodies and me with a shotgun; of course I’ll be arrested; which is good, because it actually gives me certain rights.

The police will do their investigation, find that both assailants were shot in the front, (not in the back hence running away), one had a knife....the CPS wouldn’t touch this with a barge pole; obvious case of self defence, no jury will convict.

Sometimes things are more complex then they might seem at first.

The lad is knocked to the ground, when he get's up and female police officer rushes him, says nothing to him but slams against a wall, anyone would lash out especially when being attacked!

Just because you think you would be able to determine a police office wearing a black jacket from a group of lads attacking you, doesn't make it true for everyone, especially when drink is involved.

There was no copper chasing after any of the lads that assaulted him, she walked over and had a chat and let them go, which is why the Police are now trying to identify them because the POLICE LET THEM GO!!! after committing assault, whilst arresting the victim of the assault!

You can try to dress it up as much as you want, the racist coppers arrested a victim of assault because it's their policy to arrest white people even if they are the victim of the crime!

I would also be resisting being shoved in a car, especially when I was arrested purely for being white, a victim of assault by 4 men and a female police officer who was more interested in committing assault herself that trying to arrest the people who had just assaulted someone, because her actions were clearly assault, if you go with the current "you cannot put a finger on me" left wing nutjob attitudes!

This would not be heard about if it were not for the public, hence why I posted in here, because the Police tried to stop the footage being shown, the government have tried to stop the footage being shown, and now because the government don't like that people can share footage showing the police and government doing what they are, they are trying to control just like North Korea what you can see and what you cannot!



Again the OSA is not about kids, and now we have Burnham saying he is going to restrict VPN's oh the joys of living in North Korea 2!