Cable Forum - View Single Post

jfman · Today, 11:41

If that was your argument, held consistently, for the best part of the last 15 years debate over the word “linear” wouldn’t have been necessary at all. It’s inconsistent with points you’ve previously made about savings to be made by organising a TV schedule and broadcasting according to it.

Once again you’ve got so close to the point of the Green Paper, yet missed the point entirely. State subsidy is required to push people - 1.5 million households - off DTT. Not to maintain it.

Today, 11:41	#1194
jfman Architect of Ideas Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 11,205	Re: The future for linear TV channels If that was your argument, held consistently, for the best part of the last 15 years debate over the word “linear” wouldn’t have been necessary at all. It’s inconsistent with points you’ve previously made about savings to be made by organising a TV schedule and broadcasting according to it. Once again you’ve got so close to the point of the Green Paper, yet missed the point entirely. State subsidy is required to push people - 1.5 million households - off DTT. Not to maintain it.