It’s your own post I was referring to where you “asked Gemini”. Not a single cost of maintaining the old systems that millions of people use, day in, day out, and the Green Paper anticipates 1.5 million households will use exclusively in 2035 without state intervention.
No need to take anything up with the author of any article - they’re not in this thread using it as an argument for the point you are making.
---------- Post added at 04:46 ---------- Previous post was at 04:42 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
I agree, but that doesn’t change the fact that most people equate linear TV with scheduled TV channels. It’s just a quick, but not entirely accurate definition.
This should never have derailed the whole discussion about whether traditional TV channels would continue to exist. It was a deliberate diversion to steer the discussion away from what some people didn’t want to hear.
|
Rubbish, OB. The definition is fine.
It is your (many) goal post shifts over the years and refusal to define your terms that has derailed many of the discussions. No doubt when linear television and DTT survive to 2044 you’ll claim you meant a third magical definition of “less” DTT channels.