|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Best friend or not, I’m rather embarrassed to say that Starmer was right not to join in on the Iran war.
But ‘join in’ has flexible boundaries. In one interpretation, it ‘not joining in’ means keeping totally clear of any political or tangible assistance; in another interpretation, it could mean not physically engaging but allowing our closest ally to use our sovereign bases for the USA’s purposes. I favoured the latter.
Starmer was right because Trump would have wanted to be the senior person who would call all the shots and would have got into the current mess whether or not we were in there with him.
Also, even Starmer must have realised that Trump is NOT a trusted partner. All deals/partnerships need a basis for trust. Trump only understands domination. One day, when he is ghone, a trusted alliance can be rebuilt.
In the meantime, may Starmer squirm and cry in his bed. May his whatsits turn square and fester at the corners.
__________________
Seph.
My advice is at your risk.
|