View Single Post
Old Yesterday, 13:52   #399
jfman
Architect of Ideas
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 11,175
jfman has a nice shiny star
jfman has a nice shiny starjfman has a nice shiny star
Re: The gender ideology thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
“Waiting for guidance” has been the standard excuse ever since FWS, despite the fact that the law is the law with or without guidance notes. Any number of other service providers still trying to go ‘further’ than the law, to be ‘inclusive’ in line with their ‘values’ ought to be reading today’s judgment and then having a serious chat with their in-house legal department rather than letting the blue-haired millennial in HR walk them off a cliff.
Not attempting to excuse the SNP - who have blazed a trail in this regard with taxpayer money - similarly MPs at Westminster proposing to reject the EHRC guidance. As you rightly say - it's not creating law which is already there, and ruled on by the SC.

MPs who disagree with it should push to change the primary legislation rather than be (often wilfully) ignorant about the status of guidance. Or better, put it in a manifesto, have people vote on it, then see where they go from there. (I suspect we both know, but that is the process).
jfman is offline   Reply With Quote