Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
I have a hard time believing you really believe any of this.
For a public air raid shelter network these were remarkably well hidden, and very tunelly-connecty-placey rather than simply being deep shelters as you might hope, for civilian infrastructure.
And the ‘Gaza under occupation’ trope? Save it for the Buchanan Street soap dodgers my friend, literally nobody else buys that line.
|
It’s literally considered occupied by the UN and the ICJ. Far from a trope it’s a widely recognised status by the international community. You of course know this, as I’m sure you know the pretence of the “international rules based order” relies upon believing it.
---------- Post added at 12:44 ---------- Previous post was at 12:39 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
Who would need tunnels if they were not under bombing threat? No Hamas type regime, no bombing. Jfman is somewhat blunkered by the virtual keffiyah he might be wearing.
|
There’s no actual evidence that the absence of Hamas would save Palestinians. I appreciate it’s a nice virtual comfort blanket for those who fundamentally don’t believe Palestinians should have human rights to scream “BUT THEY DON’T CONDEMN KHAMAS” but Israel have been blowing up Arabs since it’s very existence and have committed themselves to displacing people on their expansionist project for much the same timeframe.