|
Re: SNP: Two Murrells, one motorhome and a shed-load of missing cash
Should at least some of any Proceeds of Crime Act also apply to her? After all, she benefited financially from not having to pay her share of household expenses and for things that seem to have been gifts for other people. Eg Not likely that the two Vtriker kids scooters were for them. That should help the total sum recovered.
Even though she claims it was all him, both of them had higher bank balances as a result of SNP funding their household. Although that might be seen as indirect benefits, the only apparent direct benefit was when a car was sold. Haven't seen a mention of a direct transfer of money to his bank account
|